Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| blog:386_shootout_fic [2021/05/17 21:10] – [Final Thoughts] john | blog:386_shootout_fic [2021/05/17 21:12] (current) – [Final Thoughts] john | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 532: | Line 532: | ||
| * The Tx486DLC-40 going from cpu cache-disabled to the default cpu cache-enabled setting results in a **12%** improvement in Doom low-detail frame rates and **13%** in high-detail. | * The Tx486DLC-40 going from cpu cache-disabled to the default cpu cache-enabled setting results in a **12%** improvement in Doom low-detail frame rates and **13%** in high-detail. | ||
| * The Tx486DLC-40 going from cpu cache-disabled to the most optimised cache-enabled setting results in a **17%** improvement in Doom low-detail frame rates and **a staggering 35%** improvement at high-detail. | * The Tx486DLC-40 going from cpu cache-disabled to the most optimised cache-enabled setting results in a **17%** improvement in Doom low-detail frame rates and **a staggering 35%** improvement at high-detail. | ||
| - | * Boosting the ISA clock from 10MHz to 13MHz with the DLC brings just a **1%** improvement to Doom low-detail frame rates (to be expected, since we're not pushing many pixels!) but more than **6%** in high-detail. In certain benchmarks this is noticeable, but in the real world many ISA cards would be way out-of-spec at such a setting; in that case the 10MHz ISA clock is a good option. | + | * Boosting the ISA clock from 10MHz to 13MHz with the DLC brings just a **1%** improvement to Doom low-detail frame rates (to be expected, since we're not pushing many pixels!) but more than **6%** in high-detail. In certain benchmarks this is noticeable, but in the real world many ISA cards would be way out-of-spec at such a setting; in that case the 10MHz ISA clock is a good, stable increase over the ISA ' |
| * From non-optimised cache-enabled settings to most-optimised shows gains over just under **5%** in low-detail modes and **19%** in high-detail Doom timedemo results. //Who wouldn' | * From non-optimised cache-enabled settings to most-optimised shows gains over just under **5%** in low-detail modes and **19%** in high-detail Doom timedemo results. //Who wouldn' | ||