blog:escort:work:tech:afr_table

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
blog:escort:work:tech:afr_table [2024/08/04 19:14] johnblog:escort:work:tech:afr_table [2024/08/04 19:18] (current) – [Escort Tech Info - AFR/Lambda to CO] john
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Escort Tech Info - AFR/Lambda to CO ====== ====== Escort Tech Info - AFR/Lambda to CO ======
  
-The AEM AFR gauge only reads AFR/Lambda, but all the Cosworth fuelling documentation works on setting CO% figures. This table is a conversion between the two:+The AEM AFR gauge only reads AFR/Lambda, but all the Cosworth fuelling documentation works on setting CO% figures. This table is a conversion between the two, as well as the required AFR/Lambda readings for the recommended base fuelling setup for the MSD Evo chips.
  
-With Lambda/closed loop control in place, the Cosworth figures as supplied by Motorsport Developments state a figure of 1.5% CO, this is+**With** Lambda/closed loop control in place, the Cosworth figures as supplied by Motorsport Developments for their 320BHP Evo chip engine map state the following: 
 + 
 +   1.5% CO 
 +   * //corresponding to// 13.94 AFR/Lambda 
 + 
 +**Without** Lambda/closed loop control in placethe Cosworth figures as supplied by Motorsport Developments for their 320BHP Evo chip engine map state the following: 
 + 
 +   * 2.5% - 2.7% CO 
 +   * //corresponding to// 13.56 - 13.49 AFR/Lambda 
 + 
 +===== Conversion Table =====
  
 {{:blog:escort:work:tech:cotoafr-page-001.jpg?791|}} {{:blog:escort:work:tech:cotoafr-page-001.jpg?791|}}
  
 //Originally sourced from: https://www.bmw2002faq.com/forums/topic/141116-afr-to-co/// //Originally sourced from: https://www.bmw2002faq.com/forums/topic/141116-afr-to-co///
  • blog/escort/work/tech/afr_table.1722795249.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2024/08/04 19:14
  • by john