blog:photography:night:2021_09_19

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
blog:photography:night:2021_09_19 [2021/09/20 08:57] johnblog:photography:night:2021_09_19 [2021/09/20 09:59] (current) john
Line 20: Line 20:
 ==== Images ==== ==== Images ====
  
 +These first three images are tests of different exposure lengths, all at the same 800 ISO setting. At 20 seconds the image is relatively clear (though with a relatively modest amount of noise, as expected with a single exposure) with most objects in the centre of the image being well defined and without trails (objects located in the corners will always be slightly elongated on this wide-angle lens):
  
 <imgcaption 1|20s, ISO 800, Processed RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3208.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|20s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3208_raw.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|20s, ISO 800, Processed RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3208.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|20s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3208_raw.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption>
  
-25s, ISO 800 +At 25 seconds a moderate amount of objects are starting to elongate slightly:
-{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3209.jpg?400|}}{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3209_raw.jpg?400|}}+
  
-30s, ISO 800 +<imgcaption 1|25s, ISO 800, Processed RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3209.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|25s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3209_raw.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption>
-{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3210.jpg?400|}}{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3210_raw.jpg?400|}}+
  
-{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3222.jpg?400|}}{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3222_raw.jpg?400|}}+At 30 seconds, I start to get very distinct stair trails forming but quite a significant increase in the number of stars: 
 + 
 +<imgcaption 1|30s, ISO 800, Processed RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3210.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|30s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3210_raw.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> 
 + 
 +Looking back in an Easterly direction over our house, showing quite a clear starfield with just a tiny few wisps of cloud: 
 + 
 +<imgcaption 1|20s, ISO 1600, Processed RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3222.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|20s, ISO 1600, Unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3222_raw.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> 
 + 
 +**Observation:** //If I want to get more detailed starfield images, then I'm going to have to invest in a star tracker - clearly 25-30 second exposures are just long enough to start forming elongated objects even with my ultra-wide angle Tokina lens. 20 seconds appears to be the sweet spot whilst stationary.//
  • blog/photography/night/2021_09_19.1632124650.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2021/09/20 08:57
  • by john