Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
blog:photography:night:2021_10_25 [2021/10/30 22:03] – john | blog:photography:night:2021_10_25 [2021/11/06 10:11] (current) – [Images] john | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
< | < | ||
+ | There was a fairly lurid coloured moon this night, so I also switched out to my only other lens available my 105mm Sigma macro: | ||
+ | < | ||
==== Image Processing Notes ==== | ==== Image Processing Notes ==== | ||
Line 50: | Line 52: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | //The chromatic aberration settings are likely particular to my lens which is of course in this case is the ultra-wide 11mm Tokina. At 11mm and f/2.8 it has quite bad chroma in the corners of the image. It would likely not need such aggressive settings stopped down, or at the other end of it's focal length (16mm).// | ||
**2. Save as TIFF, 16bit. Load into GIMP and apply gradient as below in the direction of any light pollution** | **2. Save as TIFF, 16bit. Load into GIMP and apply gradient as below in the direction of any light pollution** | ||
Line 61: | Line 65: | ||
**4. Let ASTAP do the stacking, along with any dark, flat and bias images.** | **4. Let ASTAP do the stacking, along with any dark, flat and bias images.** | ||
- | **5. In the resulting stacked image, if the star colours look //off//, try another stacking/ | + | {{: |
+ | |||
+ | //For me, the best results were with the AstroSimple option and Sigma Clip stacking options as above.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **5. In the resulting stacked image, if the star colours look //off//, try another stacking/ | ||
**6. Export as TIFF from ASTAP and load back into your image editor of choice. I used Rawtherapee to do final image/ | **6. Export as TIFF from ASTAP and load back into your image editor of choice. I used Rawtherapee to do final image/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: |