Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| blog:486_advantech_pca6145 [2024/05/10 16:13] – [Table] john | blog:486_advantech_pca6145 [2024/05/10 16:25] (current) – [Results] john | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 553: | Line 553: | ||
| ^ PC Player | ^ PC Player | ||
| ^ PC Player | ^ PC Player | ||
| - | |||
| * Doom FPS is calculated as: (35*2134) / // | * Doom FPS is calculated as: (35*2134) / // | ||
| + | |||
| + | It appears that the Cyrix chip running in 40MHz bus mode is a really strong performer; outclassing the Am5x86 despite the higher clock speed of the AMD processor. Even at 100MHz (3x 33MHz), the lower clocked Cyrix processor is within 10% of the performance of the AMD. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The performance differential isn't too surprising considering the AMD is effectively a clock-quadrupled 486DX, whereas the Cyrix design is a cut-down and backported core from the much-maligned (but actually very impressive, if you discount the FPU) Cyrix 6x86, so it's much closer to a Pentium class processor than the AMD. | ||