Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- blog:photography:night:2021_09_19 [2021/09/20 09:55] – [Images] john
+++ blog:photography:night:2021_09_19 [2021/09/20 09:59] (current) – john
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 <imgcaption 1|25s, ISO 800, Processed RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3209.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|25s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3209_raw.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption>
-At 30 seconds, I start to get very distinct stair trails forming:
+At 30 seconds, I start to get very distinct stair trails forming but quite a significant increase in the number of stars:
 <imgcaption 1|30s, ISO 800, Processed RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3210.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|30s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3210_raw.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption>
@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 <imgcaption 1|20s, ISO 1600, Processed RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3222.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|20s, ISO 1600, Unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_19:img_3222_raw.jpg?650|}}</imgcaption>
+**Observation:** //If I want to get more detailed starfield images, then I'm going to have to invest in a star tracker - clearly 25-30 second exposures are just long enough to start forming elongated objects even with my ultra-wide angle Tokina lens. 20 seconds appears to be the sweet spot whilst stationary.//