Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- blog:photography:night:2021_09_21 [2021/09/29 20:23] – [Images] john
+++ blog:photography:night:2021_09_21 [2021/09/29 20:27] (current) – john
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ==== Images ====
+The first two images are the closest I've been able to get of the Milky Way - at my latitude and this time of year it's not greatly visible as you only get the tail edge drifting above the horizon. At ISO 3200 I can just start to make out some of the denser areas in the middle of the image. Longer exposures and/or stacking would definitely help here.
 <imgcaption 1|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 20s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3233.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 2|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 20s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3233_raw.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>
 <imgcaption 3|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO1600 20s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3234.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>  <imgcaption 4|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO1600 20s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3234_raw.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>
+Jupiter was just visible above the tops of the trees in our garden, and I tried a few variations of exposures and ISO speeds. The one below (ISO 3200, 15 seconds) was probably the best of the bunch:
 <imgcaption 5|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 15s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3239.jpg?400|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 6|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 15s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3239_raw.jpg?400|}}</imgcaption>
-I also tried out a longer lens, my Sigma 105mm, I definitely need some more practice with this one at night. 3 second exposures at just beyond what you can do at 105mm, so it really should have been 2.5s. The below image is the best of the few shots I took with it. Clearer image of Jupiter, but not as good imaging of the general starfield background:
+I also tried out a longer lens, my Sigma 105mm, I definitely need some more practice with this one at night. 3 second exposures is just beyond what you can do at 105mm, so it really should have been 2.5s. The below image is the best of the few shots I took with it. Clearer image of Jupiter, but not as good imaging of the general starfield background:
 <imgcaption 7|Sigma F2.8 105mm, ISO3200 3s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3243.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 8|Sigma F2.8 105mm, ISO3200 3s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3243_raw.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>