Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
blog:pinball_cab:vpinball_pc [2024/12/24 20:50] – created john | blog:pinball_cab:vpinball_pc [2025/01/16 09:48] (current) – [Alternative Hardware] john | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Virtual Pinball / Arcade Cabinet - PC Hardware Testing ====== | ====== Virtual Pinball / Arcade Cabinet - PC Hardware Testing ====== | ||
+ | [[blog: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * HP T740 Thin client system | ||
+ | * AMD Ryzen V1756B | ||
+ | * 4 Core / 8 Thread | ||
+ | * 3.2GHz base / 3.6GHz turbo | ||
+ | * 512KB L1 cache | ||
+ | * 2MB L2 cache | ||
+ | * 2MB L3 cache | ||
+ | * 2x 8GB DDR4 | ||
+ | * Nvidia T600 4GB (PCIe 3.0 8x) | ||
+ | * 128GB NVMe M.2 (OS) | ||
+ | * 2TB SATA M.2 (ROM and table data) | ||
+ | * Sweex 7.1 USB External sound card | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Performance Testing ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Linux === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Linux Mint 22 | ||
+ | * Visual Pinball X (standalone version built from Git main branch dated 24/12/2024) | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | On the few tables I tested (Halloween, Creature from the Black Lagoon, Attack from Mars), the render performance is consistently 100fps and latency is between 2 - 5ms (appears more dependent on the table, rather than what is going on in-game). | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is at 100Hz, 1920x1080 with no options tweaked in // | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Windows === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Whilst the Linux performance of the HP machine was quite acceptable, it was another story entirely in Windows. Performance was very erratic and jerky - running between 200% actual framerate and anywhere down to 15-20fps, for the //same// tables, on the //same// hardware. Completely unplayable. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a result I had to shelve the idea of the HP machine. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Alternative Hardware ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Gigabyte Aorus Z370 motherboard | ||
+ | * Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080 Xtreme | ||
+ | * Still running at the same 1920x1080 @ 100Hz | ||
+ | * Intel i7 9700K | ||
+ | * 32GB DDR4 2666 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Testing this alternative hardware in Windows shows that it does not suffer from the frame dips that the HP thinclient does. |