Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| blog:pinball_cab:vpinball_pc [2024/12/26 11:46] – john | blog:pinball_cab:vpinball_pc [2025/01/16 09:48] (current) – [Alternative Hardware] john | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| This is at 100Hz, 1920x1080 with no options tweaked in // | This is at 100Hz, 1920x1080 with no options tweaked in // | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Windows === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Whilst the Linux performance of the HP machine was quite acceptable, it was another story entirely in Windows. Performance was very erratic and jerky - running between 200% actual framerate and anywhere down to 15-20fps, for the //same// tables, on the //same// hardware. Completely unplayable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | As a result I had to shelve the idea of the HP machine. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Alternative Hardware ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Gigabyte Aorus Z370 motherboard | ||
| + | * Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080 Xtreme | ||
| + | * Still running at the same 1920x1080 @ 100Hz | ||
| + | * Intel i7 9700K | ||
| + | * 32GB DDR4 2666 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Testing this alternative hardware in Windows shows that it does not suffer from the frame dips that the HP thinclient does. | ||