Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| blog:pinball_cab:vpinball_pc [2025/01/16 09:45] – john | blog:pinball_cab:vpinball_pc [2025/01/16 09:48] (current) – [Alternative Hardware] john | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| === Windows === | === Windows === | ||
| - | Whilst the Linux performance of the HP machine was quite acceptable, it was another story entirely in Windows. Performance was very erratic and jerky, for the same tables, on the same hardware. | + | Whilst the Linux performance of the HP machine was quite acceptable, it was another story entirely in Windows. Performance was very erratic and jerky - running between 200% actual framerate and anywhere down to 15-20fps, for the //same// tables, on the //same// hardware. Completely unplayable. |
| As a result I had to shelve the idea of the HP machine. | As a result I had to shelve the idea of the HP machine. | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| ==== Alternative Hardware ==== | ==== Alternative Hardware ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Gigabyte Aorus Z370 motherboard | ||
| + | * Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080 Xtreme | ||
| + | * Still running at the same 1920x1080 @ 100Hz | ||
| + | * Intel i7 9700K | ||
| + | * 32GB DDR4 2666 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Testing this alternative hardware in Windows shows that it does not suffer from the frame dips that the HP thinclient does. | ||