Very clear skies with almost no cloud cover. Got some great images looking back over the house which I've not tried before. Also experimented a little more with various ISO settings with the same composition as well as wider range of exposure times.
Gear:
Weather:
Location:
Software
These first three images are tests of different exposure lengths, all at the same 800 ISO setting. At 20 seconds the image is relatively clear (though with a relatively modest amount of noise, as expected with a single exposure) with most objects in the centre of the image being well defined and without trails (objects located in the corners will always be slightly elongated on this wide-angle lens):
Fig. 1: 20s, ISO 800, Processed RAW
Fig. 1: 20s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG
At 25 seconds a moderate amount of objects are starting to elongate slightly:
Fig. 1: 25s, ISO 800, Processed RAW
Fig. 1: 25s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG
At 30 seconds, I start to get very distinct stair trails forming but quite a significant increase in the number of stars:
Fig. 1: 30s, ISO 800, Processed RAW
Fig. 1: 30s, ISO 800, Unprocessed JPEG
Looking back in an Easterly direction over our house, showing quite a clear starfield with just a tiny few wisps of cloud:
Fig. 1: 20s, ISO 1600, Processed RAW
Fig. 1: 20s, ISO 1600, Unprocessed JPEG
Observation: If I want to get more detailed starfield images, then I'm going to have to invest in a star tracker - clearly 25-30 second exposures are just long enough to start forming elongated objects even with my ultra-wide angle Tokina lens. 20 seconds appears to be the sweet spot whilst stationary.