blog:photography:night:2021_09_21

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
blog:photography:night:2021_09_21 [2021/09/29 13:21] johnblog:photography:night:2021_09_21 [2021/09/29 20:27] (current) john
Line 21: Line 21:
 ==== Images ==== ==== Images ====
  
-<imgcaption 1|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 20s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3233.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 1|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 20s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3233_raw.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>+The first two images are the closest I've been able to get of the Milky Way - at my latitude and this time of year it's not greatly visible as you only get the tail edge drifting above the horizonAt ISO 3200 I can just start to make out some of the denser areas in the middle of the imageLonger exposures and/or stacking would definitely help here.
  
-<imgcaption 2|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO1600 20s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3234.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>  <imgcaption 2|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO1600 20s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3234_raw.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>+<imgcaption 1|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 20s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3233.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 2|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 20s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3233_raw.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>
  
-{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3239.jpg?400|}} {{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3239_raw.jpg?400|}}+<imgcaption 3|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO1600 20s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3234.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>  <imgcaption 4|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO1600 20s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3234_raw.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>
  
-{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3243.jpg?550|}} {{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3243_raw.jpg?550|}}+Jupiter was just visible above the tops of the trees in our garden, and I tried a few variations of exposures and ISO speeds. The one below (ISO 3200, 15 seconds) was probably the best of the bunch: 
 + 
 +<imgcaption 5|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 15s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3239.jpg?400|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 6|Tokina F2.8 11mm, ISO3200 15s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3239_raw.jpg?400|}}</imgcaption> 
 + 
 +I also tried out a longer lens, my Sigma 105mm, I definitely need some more practice with this one at night. 3 second exposures is just beyond what you can do at 105mm, so it really should have been 2.5s. The below image is the best of the few shots I took with it. Clearer image of Jupiter, but not as good imaging of the general starfield background: 
 + 
 +<imgcaption 7|Sigma F2.8 105mm, ISO3200 3s, processed from RAW>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3243.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption> <imgcaption 8|Sigma F2.8 105mm, ISO3200 3s, unprocessed JPEG>{{:blog:photography:night:2021_09_21:img_3243_raw.jpg?550|}}</imgcaption>
  • blog/photography/night/2021_09_21.1632918077.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2021/09/29 13:21
  • by john